Pages

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

The Great Wall of China, The Berlin Wall





White House plan to help pay for border wall is a long shot

Intelligent People from all walks of life  in the world have never stated that walls that separate people were a benefit to human civilization


President Donald Trump (Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)
View photos

President Donald Trump holds up a pen he used to sign one of various bills in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington. (Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House is calling for immediate budget cuts of $18 billion from programs like medical research, infrastructure and community development grants to help pay for the border wall that President Donald Trump repeatedly promised would be financed by Mexico.
The administration would eliminate $1.2 billion in National Institutes of Health research grants, a favorite of both parties. The community development block grant program, also popular, would be halved, amounting to a cut of $1.5 billion, and Trump would strip $500 million from a transportation project known as TIGER grants.
Like Trump's 2018 budget, which was panned by both Democrats and Republicans earlier this month, the proposals have little chance to be enacted.
But they could create bad political optics for the struggling Trump White House, since the administration asked earlier for $3 billion to pay for the Trump's controversial U.S.-Mexico border wall and other immigration enforcement plans. During the campaign, Trump promised Mexico would pay for the wall.
Now, the White House wants the wall and Pentagon increases to be paid for using steep, immediate cuts to research into medical cures and funding for new roads and bridges here at home, among dozens of proposed cuts.
"The administration is asking the American taxpayer to cover the cost of a wall — unneeded, ineffective, absurdly expensive — that Mexico was supposed to pay for, and he is cutting programs vital to the middle class to get that done," said Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer of New York. "Build the wall or repair or build a bridge or tunnel or road in your community? What's the choice?"
Unlike the budget document itself, the roster of cuts do not represent official administration proposals. Instead, they were sent to Capitol Hill as a set of "options" for GOP staff aides and lawmakers crafting a catchall spending bill for the ongoing budget year, which ends Sept. 30. That suggests the White House isn't determined to press the cuts.
The documents arrived as negotiations over a catchall spending package continue Tuesday with the aim of averting a partial government shutdown at the end of next month. The package would wrap up $1.1 trillion in unfinished spending bills and address the administration's request for an immediate $30 billion in additional Pentagon spending.
Those talks are intensifying, but Senate Republicans are considering backing away from a showdown with Democrats over whether to fund Trump's request for immediate funding to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Senate Democrats have threatened to filibuster any language providing money for the wall.
Asked about including Southern border wall financing in the broader spending package, Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., a key negotiator, said, "They will not pass together. That's just my view."
Blunt added, "My view is there's a path to get 60 votes" in the Senate, the total required to overcome a Democratic filibuster.
"There is no path to put a supplemental (wall) as currently described on that package," said Blunt, a member of the Senate GOP leadership team and is major player on health and human services accounts.
The government would shut down except for some functions on April 29 without successful action on spending. GOP leaders are eager to avoid a politically damaging shutdown, especially in the wake of last week's embarrassing failure to pass the Trump-pushed bill to "repeal and replace" former President Barack Obama's landmark health care law and Trump's decision to abandon the effort.
Negotiators have made progress on the core elements of a dozen must-do funding bills but have ignored the White House's list of cuts in doing so.
But the White House badly wants funding for the Mexico wall and hasn't fully engaged in the Hill negotiations. Pitfalls and land mines lay ahead in the talks, and the situation is especially fragile because of divisions among GOP ranks and uncertainty over who's playing the lead role at the White House on the particulars of budget work.
According to new details sent to Congress, the administration wants immediate funding to complete an existing barrier in the Rio Grande Valley, $500 million to complete 28 miles of border levee wall near McAllen, Texas, and $350 million for construction along two segments near San Diego

No comments: